The Root of the Problem

Like many nerds I have liked my favorite societies and funding agencies on Facebook. Two of them posted this press release from the NSF today summarizing a study that suggests that students in classes that have activities and interaction do better than those who are in classes that are purely lecture based. Not surprising of course, and not restricted to STEM fields. Plenty of students do well with lectures, but interaction in some form is important. In short:

“A significantly greater number of students fail science, engineering and math courses that are taught lecture-style than fail in classes incorporating so-called active learning that expects them to participate in discussions and problem-solving beyond what they’ve memorized.

What this press release doesn’t discuss though, are two key problems that exist that will make solving this problem exceedingly difficult; absurdly large classes and temporary adjunct labor.

Doing interactive classes is simple when you have 20 students. You can bring in materials, hold discussions, do lab exercises, etc. 100 students gets tough, and 150 or more and you are really fuchsited. I know, I know look at these great iClickers we can use where we can have all 600 students in a lecture hall participate. Besides being total crap, that type of interaction isn’t really what is being talked about in this study. This study was focusing on activities that helped students learn to “think like a scientist,” I’ve been a scientist now for years and I have yet to meet a problem that I’ve solved via multiple choice. iClickers and all other edu-hoaxes are not the same as actual interaction.

In addition, designing and implementing in-class activities takes time. You might want to prep materials before hand, and you will undoubtably refine the exercise over time. Great it you are full time, but with a large majority of classes being taught by adjuncts, this is unrealistic. Adjuncts are not paid for prep time, often have exceedingly limited resources, and have no guarantee, or even reasonable expectation, that they will ever teach at that school again.

So if you are full time and have a class of 25, awesome. I was lucky enough to go to a school like this, lots of small classes and an environment that both attracted and helped foster innovative teaching methods. This isn’t the case for most students though, most students in science classes at the college level are not going to be in small classes with full time faculty. These ideas on how to improve education are well and good, but we cannot pretend like there aren’t systemic and structural failings in the modern university that make the implementation of these recommendations on a large scale unrealistic. I suppose my point is that fixing American science education (or any education, this isn’t limited to STEM field, those are just the ones I know the best) will take much more than telling people to be more interactive. We also need to rebuild the environment where interaction can happen for all students, not just for the students lucky enough to be in a class of 20 with a full time instructor.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to The Root of the Problem

  1. Ms. B says:

    The Spring 2014 Community College Journal published by CPFA (CA Part-time Faculty Assoc) just published an article by M. Hanzimanolis about the 2012 Scorecard showing that new/”unprepared” college students do worse under part-time faculty than under full-time faculty yet we all know that full-time faculty don’t want to teach these lower level courses and push them off onto cheap labor. The results of this study make complete sense and I ought to know since I teach the remedial level courses. I just don’t have the time nor do I get paid to deal with the almost excessive needs of these “students” which now includes incredible behavioral problems, the term being used, “entitled brats” by some…This semester was, by far, my worst semester of teaching after many years. My students were not students but inchoate, infantile, raging children. This is causing many adjuncts to bail out and some full timers I know. Not only are we in a crisis as far as fairly compensating our temp instructors is concerned but now you are asking us to deal with a lot more b.s. with these kids not to mention many of them cannot read or write when we get them, as we all know. Now, it’s temper tantrums in every class. On top of this, you are lucky if the dept even acknowledges your existence let alone provides you support for this b.s. Forget it.
    The solution is (sorry guys) full-time faculty should HAVE to teach remedial level courses because they are FULL-TIME, have the office, resources, and are PAID to provide this level of attention. Adjuncts should be the ones to teach the higher level courses because they do not require the hours the lower level courses do. Plus, many of us work or are at an advanced level in our careers and it is appropriate we teach the higher level courses. In many cases we know our topic better because we WORK in it/live it. We are in the real world. Also, more mature students don’t eat up our (completely unpaid) time or throw melodramatic shit fits in front of the entire class (that include mouthing off at the instructor) when they get a D on their 10 point quiz. Being an adjunct is already a kind of abuse let alone dealing with basically, children. The standards of our country will continue to drop into the toilet because now many of the better adjuncts are getting out of this cheap labor grind. One HR person of a comm college in CA told me “we just can’t find good teachers anymore” re: adjuncts. Gee, big surprise. So who will be teaching our students then?
    Let me guess–the person who just finished getting their M.A. “degree” from a for-profit online college with questionable/if any accreditation. The downward spiral will continue until we deal with this but then again, this is America in 2014 where we don’t deal with anything.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s